The British Broadcasting Corporation’s ‘Sherlock’ series has
garnered great support and has probably amassed a huge fandom since it
premiered. I think this has taken place quickly and more so than other English
soaps because each season has just three episodes which leave the audience
begging for more. Even more so is the great initiative to bring Doyle’s most
beloved character into the present age and still maintain the same amount of
respect for the author’s original work. But then, the BBC is expected to do
something new and that is why it is where it stands today.
Now this may seem a bit funky because I read it in a feature on BBC’s website itself but it claims that Sherlock has obtained widespread acclaim from Chinese viewers too. It seems that when the British Prime Minister visited China and opened an account on a local social networking site, most of the requests he received were for the third season of ‘Sherlock’ to be released as soon as possible. This may and can be true, but with so many international issues at stake, would the most number of requests a Prime Minister receives be concerning a show? (China, you never cease to amaze me).
Let me now explain the title to this post. It seems that
Curly Fu and Peanut are the names given to the characters of Sherlock Holmes
and Dr. John Watson respectively by their fans there. Apparently, their names
resemble the Chinese (Cantonese or Mandarin, I don’t know which) names to some
extent.
Another interesting part of that selfsame article was where
it was mentioned that people there also read homosexuality in the show. They
claim to make out that the show reinforces a strong tie that exists between the
two central characters to such an extent that may even be homosexual in nature.
Now I, in my three years of reading Doyle’s work as a reader and in another
three as a student of English literature have never even imagined that such a
relationship may be hinted at, what with Watson getting married and Sherlock
having a secret crush on ‘The Woman’. Well, it may be so in the show and maybe
I've never thought of it like that but I’m certainly going to watch the
previous two seasons very closely, not only for this factor but also for others
which may have escaped me before.
And to the director of this show, I say, “Good show, old
chap!”
No comments:
Post a Comment