Journalists are those who have taken up the challenge to inform the general public of what is happening around
them. They swear to do so with all the morality and with every ounce of ethical
matter they posses.
Now, I know that it doesn't always turn out this way and
some journalists tend to go off the path they started out on, however, this is
the code of the journalist and it has remained as such; preserved within those
few who have upheld the torch of truth in the bog of deceit that surrounds us.
I, like any other aspiring journalist, would like to believe
that there is still something to be salvaged from the apparent wreck of
journalism. Although my realistic side does tend to give me a slap now and
again about my childish folly, I want to believe that every journalist is human
first and a pawn of society second.
This is because the journalist has something that is called
a conscience. An inherent feeling of what is right and wrong. And even though
they cannot afford the luxury of subjectivity in their line of work, they still
have the sacred duty of protecting the society in their role as gatekeepers of
any and all information that is received by the mass.
Image Courtesy: Google Images/The Guardian. |
I recently read somewhere that a few media houses had begun
using robots, yes, robots to automatically update news from sources. These ‘technological
marvels’ auto-update news on the basis of pre-set priorities from a given
clutter of information.
How, I ask?
How can a machine tell what information is to be
disseminated and what is not?
How can a machine distinguish between right and wrong?
How can a machine judge situation based on real-time
scenarios the way humans do?
I believe they cannot. Period.
They say that these robots are just supplementary machines
to help the human journalist spread information faster. At present they only
update harmless news which requires no analysis. Well, what next? The next
thing you know, computers will be compiling full page reports on happenings. Will
the human element be taken out of the equation entirely? I probably think so.
Maybe I’m being paranoid and maybe I’m just worried that I may
not get a job when I finish communication school, but is this justified? Computers
dishing out analysis that require the human mind and conscience to do the job?
I
think not.
No comments:
Post a Comment