There’s
this quote going around that people credit to the author of works such as
‘1984’ and ‘Animal Farm’. It goes something like this…
Yeah, this quote. |
Now, let me
confess something right at the beginning.
I don’t
really know if he said it or if it means something else altogether or if he
meant it as a very complex metaphor to say something that I haven’t understood,
but from what I gather from its literal meaning is that journalism is about
letting people know about things that other don’t want them to know.
Now maybe
he might not have used this quote to convey an absolute definition of
journalism but seen and understood on its own, without a point of reference, it
does seem like a very confined view of the field to me.
Saying that
journalism is printing what others don’t want printed defines only one aspect
of the many possibilities journalism holds. Information, knowledge, awareness,
peacekeeping, gate keeping and even revolution are some of the various aspects
of what one might call journalism per se.
Printing
only what others don’t want printed seems to then be a very stunted view which
implies that only the bad side of human nature is what journalism should strive
to portray.
But
journalism, as far as I understand it, stands as a mirror before society,
showing it its true face, pretty or ugly, sane or insane, free or enslaved. But
always what society really looks like, not only what-must-not-be-said.
Image Courtesy: genius.com |
Some might
today claim that the media has become biased, that it does show only what it
wants to, that it all depends on the interest of those who control the media.
Others claim that ‘breaking news’ is all what the media is about today. And
still others believe that the amount of bad news being printed and broadcast is
more than the good that is happening in society.
Does that
mean this quote holds true?
Not
necessarily. One has to look beyond the bad to search for the good. It does
happen all around us and it is reported. Maybe it’s just that we are so attuned
to the bad that we cannot find enough good to make it count.
As someone
actually working in this industry, I know how hard journalists toil to search
for a good story amongst the murders and suicides of everyday life. These stories
then appear in print and are broadcast, but are we open enough to give the good news enough credit?
Are we ready
to admit that George Orwell might, just might, be wrong?
Are we?
No comments:
Post a Comment